Life as a Spectator Sport

A proud member of the reality-based community


Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Nice fresh red meat. Or is it?

Just what we needed, carbon monoxide in our meat. Isn't the food industry wonderful?
CHICAGO - There's something new in the meat sections of grocery stores nationwide-- sparking a debate about the color of fresh meat. You may see red, but is it something less? When it comes to buying meat, consumers often shop with their eyes: the color of meat is directly equated to its freshness in the minds of many.

But a different way of treating meat could change that, as it changes the way some meat looks.

In the red of a steak, the pink of ground pork and the color of fresh tuna, there is something new in the air, literally. It's a way of packaging meat consumers haven't been told about, with an ingredient not usually associated with food: carbon monoxide.

[..]

The color of fresh meat is universally known: bright red. After a few days, the telltale brown color signals to consumers that the meat is getting old.

But carbon monoxide may change that.

When exposed to case-ready meat, the kind packaged before it gets to the store, the gas reacts with the meat's pigment to create a new, more stable color.

Critics are concerned that the treated meat may stay red longer than it stays fresh.

Dr. Don Berdahl speaks for a Michigan food company, Kalsec, which says the Food and Drug Administration broke its own rules when it allowed the meat treatment.

"The consumer, who's always used color as a test for freshness or wholesomeness, can no longer use this test or indicator," Berdahl said. "There are statutes that forbid this. The FDA did not follow the processes that are needed to approve what is, in fact, a color additive."

Kalsec admitted it has competitive motives -- the food company could lose business to the carbon monoxide packaging.

But photos from an independent lab study show there are also safety reasons to fight the additive, NBC5's Lisa Parker reported.

When carbon monoxide is added to the atmosphere inside packages of ground beef, the meat at day one looks just like the meat at day 12.

A study found that all the carbon-monoxide samples remained bright red in color throughout the 12-day test, even in the meat stored at 50 degrees Fahrenheit.

While no one has suggested the carbon monoxide in and of itself is dangerous here -- the amounts are very small -- the concern is the meat will look safe and fresh, when in fact, it no longer is, Parker reported.

"You could potentially have this bright red meat picked up by consumers, thinking that it's fresh, when actually it contains bacteria that are going to be very injurious to their health," Rosenbaum said.

U.S. food safety agencies have long condemned any procedure that could mislead consumers.

In 2004, two agencies, the FDA and the Department of Agriculture, first expressed concern that the use of carbon monoxide with fresh meat may cause the meat to retain its fresh color longer than meat not so treated, thereby misleading the consumer and increasing the potential for masking spoilage.

The agencies later reversed those concerns after deciding carbon monoxide is not a food additive in this case.

"Government scientists at the FDA have reviewed this technology not once, but on four occasions, and each time have arrived at the same conclusion -- that the process is appropriate and safe," Huffman said.
I'd sure like to know why the FDA changed its initial ruling. Sorry, "Government scientists . . . have review this technology" just doesn't do it for me. Time for some whistle-blowers to come out of the woodwork.
The meat industry says the benefits of the packaging technology far outweigh any possible downside.

"This petition that has been filed against this technology is really about money, not food safety," Huffman said.

But money is also key for the meat industry, Parker reported. It's estimated at least $1 billion of meat sales are lost every year due to meat discoloration.

By prolonging the amount of time it stays red, sales can only go up, Parker reported.

[..]

The treatment affects only case-ready meat -- the pre-packaged stuff, not the meat handled and wrapped by a butcher in the store.

Parker reported that the FDA did no independent testing of the carbon monoxide additive -- they relied on the companies using the technology for information.
The FDA did no independent testing. Because they trust the food industry to tell the truth? Or because their funding has been cut to such an extent that there wasn't money for it? Somebody needs to look into this.
posted by Liz @ 10:14 PM     |


The template is set to display 10 posts. To see all the posts for this month, click on the month name in the Archive section

This site is a member of WebRing. To browse visit here.



RSS Feed


PERSONAL

Send email to
liz at life-as-a-spectator-sport.com
Home

I'm a mother, grandmother, a computer professional, Democrat, Christian. I welcome politely worded comments and email, my spam filter throws the rest away, so don't bother to flame me

WHY 'LIFE AS A SPECTATOR SPORT'

"If you're lucky not to live in the gutters of a slum, but still can't afford to take vacations in the Alps, you're part of that enormous middle class who lives life through the medium of the television, further separated from "real" life by air conditioner, by automobile, by dishwasher, microwave and ice-in-the-door refrigerator, by automatic washer and dryer, and all the other appliances and conveniences that make it possible for America to live life at second hand. I'm not sure why Americans decided that televised drama was better than the real thing, that cardboard microwave food containers were an adequate substitute for real dishes, and their contents for real food, or that cooking, dishwashing and face-to-face conversation wasn't worth the effort and time it required. Someone fed this nation a plastic crate of out-of-season tomatoes and told us it was life and we took them at their word, and we're so much the poorer for it that it's hard to know where to start to list the shortcomings."


I wrote this a couple of years ago, but I have to admit it's much less amusing than I thought it would be to see the artifical construct falling apart.

THE NON-ELECTRIC HOME

Cleaning, 1
Cleaning, 2
Cleaning, 3

KNITTING BLOGS

Extravayarnza
Knitting Heretic
Mind of Winter
Pie Knits
Persistent Illusion
See Eunny Knit
The Keyboard Biologist
Taleweaver's Ramblings
TECHnitting
Wendy Knits

FINISHED PROJECTS


SELF-RELIANCE AND THE FUTURE

-- Blogs and websites --
Causubon's Book
Club Orlov
Food Storage Made Easy
From the Wilderness
In the Wake
Listening to Katrina
Survival Topics
The Modern Homestead
The Oil Drum
Notes from a Hillside Farm

-- Mailing Lists --
12vdc Power
Living on the Land
Rainwater
Refrigeration Alternatives
Old Ways of Living

POLITICAL BLOGS and SITES

The political sites have moved

BOOKS I'M READING

How to Grow More Vegetables, etc.
Small Scale Grain Raising

ARCHIVES

February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
August 2008
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

Powered by BLOGGER Template made possible by BLOGSKINS.